omnist.world

Deutsch

Climate movement · Compare this tradition with another

As Conservatives slam net zero at conference, data shows 68% of their seats contain properties facing subsidence risk

no name given · Greenpeace UK · 2026-10-07 · London · Source

Responsibility · main message Justice · carrying Truthfulness · carrying

The Conservative scrapping of the net zero target and the expansion of fossil fuel extraction endanger property values and the livelihoods of their own voters in areas with high subsidence risk.

People's homes are in danger, literally sinking into the ground, along with any credibility the Conservatives ever had on environmental issues.

The text is a press release from Greenpeace UK that links data on climate-related ground subsidence risk in English constituencies with the party-political seat distribution. The core claim is that 68 percent of constituencies held by Conservatives contain properties that could be affected by subsidence risk by 2050, while Labour holds 118 such seats. The data come from an analysis by Aviva based on the British Geological Survey under the UKCP09 medium emissions projection. The text sets these figures in the context of the Conservative Party conference in Birmingham, where the scrapping of the net zero target and the expansion of oil and gas extraction are announced. Greenpeace campaign director Lily-Rose Ellis is quoted with a sharp criticism of Conservative climate policy, which she presents as a loss of credibility and a danger to voters. The text emphasises that subsidence occurs particularly in clay areas of the South East, where the Conservatives are strong, and refers to specific constituencies such as Weald of Kent and North West Essex. It is pointed out that these are area-based projections, not predictions for individual properties.

Worldview

what this means
What, according to this text, is the root of the evil?
Greed, consumption, an insatiable desire for more; Ignorance, illusion, a false view of reality
Where does the evil reside?
in the economy, politics, or social structures
What helps against it?
practical action towards the neighbour, good works; insight, learning, enlightenment, right understanding
What is human being according to this text?
self-determined, the author of one's own actions
Where is history heading?
it is getting worse, an order is coming to an end
What does the text base its claim on?
on argument, logic, science; on personal experience, testimony, encounter
To whom does the text's call for devotion apply?
to every human being, regardless of faith
Where is the text's criticism directed?
at others, at society, at other groups

Related texts from other traditions

by similarity of the analysis, one text per tradition

What the text calls for

Measured

Basic stance
-1 from -2 to 2
Insistence
3 of 3
Reach
4 of 5
Concreteness
3 of 3
Boundary
2 of 3, named: konservative Partei und ihre Wähler
Time
past 1, present 3, future 2

Analysed with qwen3.8-27b, version v3. The same standards apply to every tradition, see Values.

Show the full text
While the shadow housing secretary Katie Lam claims to be able to save £50,000 from the cost of a new house by cutting “ideological net zero regulations”, more than two-thirds (68%) of Conservative constituencies in England have homes at risk of climate change driven subsidence, according to a new analysis by Greenpeace of insurance industry data. The data shows that 246 constituencies contain properties at some risk of subsidence between now and 2050 – 45% of all 543 constituencies in England. Of these, 76 are currently held by Conservative MPs, while Labour hold 118 seats, the Liberal Democrats hold 39, Reform hold 6 and the Greens hold none. The data comes as the Conservatives gather for their annual party conference in Birmingham where they are calling for a bonfire of regulations that protect the environment and net zero targets. One of the main causes of subsidence is changes in the moisture level of the underlying soils, exacerbated by extremes of wet and dry weather that are getting worse because of a changing climate. Lily-Rose Ellis, climate campaigner for Greenpeace UK, said: “People’s homes are at risk of literally sinking into the ground along with any credibility the Conservatives once had on the environment. Their love affair with oil and gas will please Donald Trump and the fossil fuel industry, but will do nothing to help their constituents facing the risk of sinking homes, rising premiums and plummeting property values. Previous Conservative leaders understood that cutting carbon is essential to protecting what we love – from our countryside to our homes to our children’s futures. Kemi is all about playing climate politics – not conserving our future.” The data also shows that 50% of the properties in Katie Lam’s Weald of Kent constituency, and 56% of the properties in Kemi Badenoch’s North West Essex seat, are at risk of subsidence by 2050. Kemi Badenoch is expected to use her keynote speech at the Conservative conference to undermine climate action and expand the burning of fossil fuels, despite the high energy bills and fuel prices paid by consumers as a result of foreign wars. Under her leadership, the Conservatives have pledged to scrap the 2050 net zero target and to maximise extraction of oil and gas from the North Sea under Trump’s slogan “drill, baby, drill”. Subsidence is a particular risk in areas where homes are built on clay, which includes large areas of the South East where the Conservatives are strong. It also includes very significant numbers of homes in Labour-held seats in London – a key political battleground in the coming Mayoral and General elections. ENDS Contact Greenpeace UK Press Office – press.uk@greenpeace.org or 020 7865 8255 Notes The figures come from Aviva’s Building Future Communities 2025 constituency statistics. They count properties at possible or probable risk of subsidence by the 2050s, based on British Geological Survey data under the UKCP09 medium emissions projection. Party holdings are taken from the Parliament API as of 23 September 2026. Data on subsidence was not available for Wales and Scotland. Data is available on request. The 68% figure is a Greenpeace calculation based on the data and the numbers of seats held by each party. A constituency is counted as being at risk if it contains any property in a subsidence risk area. These are area-based projections, not predictions that individual properties will suffer subsidence; the level of risk to individual properties varies widely within constituencies. Of the seats where more than half of properties are at risk, 27 are held by the Conservatives and 78 are held by Labour – most of them in London. Outside the capital the two parties hold 22 such seats each. The post As Conservatives slam net zero at conference, data shows 68% of their seats contain properties facing subsidence risk appeared first on Greenpeace UK .