omnist.world

Deutsch

Climate movement · Compare this tradition with another

Jackdaw and Rosebank – how did we get here?

no name given · Greenpeace UK · 2026-09-18 · London · Source

Justice · main message Responsibility · carrying Truthfulness · carrying

The approval of new oil and gas fields in the North Sea primarily serves the interests of the industry and brings no real benefits for consumers or workers, which is why the government should instead invest in a just transition to clean energy.

So, after four years of campaigning, court cases, consultations and political changes, we are at a relatively simple choice: approve further oil and gas fields that lead us further in the wrong direction, or start properly investing in what comes next.

The text summarises the political and legal process surrounding the approval of the Jackdaw and Rosebank oil and gas fields in the North Sea. It describes how Greenpeace successfully challenged the approvals in court, as they did not adequately account for the emissions from the later combustion of the raw material. The new Labour government under Andy Burnham and Miatta Fahnbulleh now faces the decision of whether to re-approve the fields or to opt for clean alternatives. The author argues that extraction brings no real benefits for consumers or workers, but primarily benefits the oil and gas industry. A warning is issued against repeating the mistakes made in the closure of the coal industry and instead shaping a just transition to clean energy. The core demand is not to approve the new fields and instead to invest in renewable industries in order to meet price stability and climate targets.

Worldview

what this means
What, according to this text, is the root of the evil?
Exploitation, oppression, unequal conditions; Ignorance, illusion, a false view of reality
Where does the evil reside?
in the economy, politics, or social structures
What helps against it?
just social or political conditions; practical action towards the neighbour, good works
What is human being according to this text?
above all a part of a community or of creation
Where is history heading?
it is getting better, development towards the good
What does the text base its claim on?
on argument, logic, science
To whom does the text's call for devotion apply?
to every human being, regardless of faith
Where is the text's criticism directed?
at others, at society, at other groups

Related texts from other traditions

by similarity of the analysis, one text per tradition

What the text calls for

Measured

Basic stance
1 from -2 to 2
Insistence
2 of 3
Reach
4 of 5
Concreteness
3 of 3
Boundary
1 of 3, named: Öl- und Gasindustrie
Time
past 1, present 3, future 2

Analysed with qwen/qwen3.8-27b, version v3. The same standards apply to every tradition, see Values.

Show the full text
If you’ve lost track of what exactly is happening with Jackdaw and Rosebank, you can probably be forgiven. Both North Sea oil and gas fields have now survived two governments, multiple legal challenges and a changing approvals process – and we’re still waiting to find out whether they will actually go ahead. A quick recap. Jackdaw was approved by the Conservative government in June 2022, followed by Rosebank in September 2023. Greenpeace challenged both decisions in court, working with Uplift on Rosebank , on the fairly fundamental basis that you can’t decide whether a new oil or gas field is compatible with our climate commitments without considering the emissions created when that oil and gas is actually burned. The Supreme Court agreed with that principle in the Finch case in June 2024. Following the general election, the Labour government then decided not to defend the previous government’s approvals of Jackdaw and Rosebank in court, and the approvals were subsequently ruled unlawful. Since then, we’ve had new environmental guidance, a public consultation and another change at the top of government. The consultation has now closed and we’re waiting for the next decision on the future of the fields. Which brings us to Andy Burnham and Miatta Fahnbulleh. This will be one of the first big climate and energy tests for the new government, and it comes after another record-breaking summer. Miatta spoke this week about bringing bills down, ending the price volatility that comes with our reliance on fossil fuels and working with civil society to deliver change. The decision on Jackdaw and Rosebank is a pretty immediate opportunity to demonstrate what that means in practice. Our view hasn’t changed: neither field should go ahead. For all the industry’s promises about jobs and energy security, it’s worth asking who actually benefits. Jackdaw would create just 27 new direct full-time jobs, according to the developer’s own assessment. And the oil and gas produced won’t be reserved for British households at cheaper prices – it will be sold by private companies on international markets, at international prices. Rosebank isn’t exactly providing a great advert for the alternative either. Production has already been pushed back after two pieces of drilling equipment, including a safety valve, were accidentally dropped 1,100 metres to the seabed. So consumers don’t get cheaper energy. Workers don’t get the scale of secure, long-term jobs being promised. And more North Sea drilling doesn’t free us from volatile global fossil fuel prices. The clearest beneficiary is the oil and gas industry itself. North Sea workers and communities deserve a much better offer: serious investment in clean industries, secure jobs and a properly managed transition. The brutal and badly managed closure of Britain’s coal industry showed what happens when governments fail to plan properly for workers and communities. We shouldn’t repeat those mistakes. So after four years of campaigning, court cases, consultations and political change, we’re back to a relatively simple choice: approve more oil and gas fields that take us further in the wrong direction, or start investing properly in what comes next. We’ll be pushing Andy and Miatta to choose the latter. Areeba The post Jackdaw and Rosebank – how did we get here? appeared first on Greenpeace UK .