omnist.world

Deutsch

Protestant · Compare this tradition with another

AI

no name given · St Martin-in-the-Fields London - Sermons und Thought for the Week · 2026-09-27 · London · Source

Responsibility · main message Humility · carrying Truthfulness · carrying

The development of artificial intelligence must be guided by human values and ethical responsibility in order to protect the dignity of humanity from economic and technological interests.

the Archbishop urged with great emphasis that the development of AI technology be advanced at a human pace and with human goals, in order to place humanity "before profit, convenience, or technological progress at all costs."

The text reflects on the current debates surrounding artificial intelligence, which range from existential warnings to potential cures. The author refers to a speech by Archbishop Sarah in the House of Lords, which calls for a human orientation of AI development. This speech draws on Christian values such as sacrifice, humility, and service, which are rooted in the biblical readings from Philippians and Matthew. The central demand is to place humanity before profit, convenience, and technological progress at all costs. A warning is issued that AI is already leading to the concentration of wealth, job losses, and misinformation. The author hopes that decision-makers in business and politics will follow this advice in order to keep the technology in the service of humanity.

Worldview

what this means
What, according to this text, is the root of the evil?
Greed, consumption, an insatiable desire for more
Where does the evil reside?
in the economy, politics, or social structures
What helps against it?
just social or political conditions; practical action towards the neighbour, good works
What is human being according to this text?
willed by God, with a task and a responsibility
Where is history heading?
it is getting worse, an order is coming to an end (inferred)
What does the text base its claim on?
on the holy scripture of its own tradition; on a present head, teacher, or office
To whom does the text's call for devotion apply?
to every human being, regardless of faith
Where is the text's criticism directed?
at others, at society, at other groups

Related texts from other traditions

by similarity of the analysis, one text per tradition

What the text calls for

Passages cited

Phil 2,1-13 · Mt 21,23-32

Measured

Basic stance
1 from -2 to 2
Insistence
2 of 3
Reach
4 of 5
Concreteness
2 of 3
Boundary
0 of 3
Time
past 1, present 3, future 2

Analysed with qwen/qwen3.8-27b, version v3. The same standards apply to every tradition, see Values.

Show the full text
Over the past two weeks the news has been filled with dire warnings about the existential threat posed by artificial intelligence. These are all the more alarming in circumstances where they have been articulated by those at the forefront of the technological developments which will potentially lead us to Armageddon. It is undeniable that AI confronts humankind with very difficult choices. It has the potential to find cures for diseases previously thought incurable; to enable astonishing scientific and technological advances; and to create immense opportunities for creativity and collaboration. However, even if AI does not ultimately destroy the world, it is already leading to an unprecedented concentration of wealth and power; eliminating jobs; generating swathes of misinformation; and placing huge demands on natural resources at a time of climate crisis. Looking for guidance on how to think about these profoundly important issues (obviously using ChatGPT…) I stumbled across Archbishop Sarah’s prescient speech in a House of Lords debate on the human impact of AI held in June*. While this does not seem to have gained much airtime, her exhortation for politicians to ensure that AI is designed, built, regulated and used to serve rather than diminish humanity, as well as to cherish and protect truth and the trust it inspires between people and within societies, deserves a much wider audience. Drawing on the Christian values of sacrifice, humility and service through action which are encapsulated in today’s readings from Philippians 2: 1-13 and Matthew 21: 23-32, the Archbishop powerfully urged the development of AI technology at a human pace and with human objectives so as to put humanity ‘ahead of profit, convenience or technological progress at all costs’. I, for one, hope that corporate and governmental decision-makers (or at least their AI agents) heed this sage advice. * https://www.archbishopofcanterbury.org/node/31/archbishop-canterburys-house-lords-debate-human-impact-artificial-intelligence Matthew Morrison