Climate movement · Compare this tradition with another
Why the world's financial system matters for the climate
no name given ·
Greenpeace International ·
2026-10-13
· Amsterdam
· Source
Justice · main message
Responsibility · carrying
Care
Addressing the climate crisis requires a redesign of the global financial architecture that mobilises resources for climate protection and justice through the taxation of extreme wealth and the implementation of the polluter-pays principle.
We need fairer tax systems that shift the burden onto those who cause harm and profit from it, rather than relying on regressive consumption taxes.
The text links the current climate crisis to the global financial architecture and calls for a redesign of international tax and financial policy. It argues that international institutions such as the IMF and the World Bank, through austerity measures and debt burdens, prevent developing countries from responding adequately to climate risks. The main burden of the consequences of climate change is borne by those who have contributed the least, while the wealthiest investors and corporations profit from the crisis. The text advocates for the taxation of extreme wealth and assets to settle the so-called 'climate debts' of the super-rich. A strong global tax treaty of the United Nations is considered necessary to secure fair revenues for climate protection and adaptation. The demand is directed at governments and international bodies to implement the responsibility of polluters through concrete tax measures. The goal is to release resources for a just transition and the protection of vulnerable communities.
- What, according to this text, is the root of the evil?
-
Exploitation, oppression, unequal conditions; Greed, consumption, an insatiable desire for more
- Where does the evil reside?
-
in the economy, politics, or social structures
- What helps against it?
-
just social or political conditions; practical action towards the neighbour, good works
- What is human being according to this text?
-
self-determined, the author of one's own actions
- Where is history heading?
-
it is getting better, development towards the good
- What does the text base its claim on?
-
on personal experience, testimony, encounter; on argument, logic, science
- To whom does the text's call for devotion apply?
-
to every human being, regardless of faith
- Where is the text's criticism directed?
-
at others, at society, at other groups
Related texts from other traditions
by similarity of the analysis, one text per tradition
What the text calls for
- Superreiche besteuern (social)
- Regierungen drängen (social)
- Name hinzufügen (social)
Measured
- Basic stance
- 1 from -2 to 2
- Insistence
- 3 of 3
- Reach
- 4 of 5
- Concreteness
- 2 of 3
- Boundary
- 2 of 3, named: Wohlhabendste Verursacher von Umweltverschmutzung, Superreiche, fossile Brennstoffindustrie
- Time
- past 1, present 3, future 2
Analysed with qwen/qwen3.8-27b, version v3.
The same standards apply to every tradition, see Values.
Show the full text
As governments, civil society, lawmakers and international financial institutions gather in Thailand for the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and World Bank Annual Meetings this week, they are convening against a backdrop of escalating extreme weather events around the world that makes the question of securing sufficient climate finance to fund solutions impossible to ignore.
Greenpeace Thailand calls on major polluters to take responsibility for the climate impacts they have contributed to, and urges the Thai government to stop further fossil fuel expansion and accelerate a just transition to renewable energy. © Chanklang Kanthong / Greenpeace
Bangkok, the host city for the meetings, recently declared a flood disaster as thousands had to flee from their homes. This summer, Europe experienced devastating heatwaves and wildfires. Just weeks ago, catastrophic floods and landslides in Nepal killed more than 1,250 people and left thousands missing, prompting the United Nations and humanitarian partners to launch a US$49.6 million emergency appeal.
These disasters are a reminder that sufficiently financing necessary climate action is not an abstract debate for future negotiations. People are already paying dearly for an accelerating climate crisis, while facing escalating food prices and higher energy bills. Yet the countries facing the greatest climate vulnerabilities remain trapped by repressive rules and conditions that constrain fiscal space, impose high debt burdens and pressure their governments to reduce public spending, while the wealthiest polluters are profiting from these crises without paying their fair share.
Greenpeace Thailand staff and volunteers support communities affected by severe flooding in Chachoengsao Province, Thailand. The flooding, which began affecting the province on 25 September, has impacted 11 districts and more than 23,790 households. © Chanklang Kanthong / Greenpeace
How is economic justice connected to climate justice?
As the climate crisis worsens, global policy responses are lagging behind the urgent need for securing sufficient funding for mitigation, adaptation, and loss and damage. Redesigning our domestic and global tax systems is central to shifting the burden of cost to the wealthiest polluters and for mobilising necessary resources for climate action.
The IMF and World Bank occupy a powerful position in the global financial architecture, and must adapt and respond to today’s polycrisis rather than further exacerbating it. Their approaches must reflect the realities countries face today, rather than further restricting public spending and deepening fiscal pressures. Their role should be helping countries reach their sustainable development goals and not further distancing them from it.
Greenpeace Philippines activists join thousands of marchers at the Quezon Memorial to call for dirty energy companies to “Pay up for Climate Finance” and to demand the government seek climate justice. © Jilson Tiu / Greenpeace
For decades , government budget cuts and higher taxes (austerity) have been central to the economic advice forced upon developing nations by the IMF and the World Bank, trapping them in a destructive cycle. The way governments raise revenue matters as much as how much revenue they raise. Many developing countries rely heavily on regressive indirect and consumption taxes and further exploitation and extraction of natural resources. Indeed, World Bank research shows that in several developing nations, steep taxes on basic goods leave low-income households bearing the brunt of the tax pressures.
Ordinary people should not be expected to carry an ever-increasing share of this burden while budget cuts and unsustainable debt strip away public investment meant to build a fairer and more resilient future those public funds are meant to secure.
How is the climate crisis linked to extreme wealth?
While those who contributed the least to the crisis are bearing the greatest impacts, the wealthiest and biggest polluters often get away with not paying their fair share. Recent research by Greenpeace Africa highlights a critical factor that is too often ignored in climate finance debates: who owns the assets driving global emissions?
View this post on Instagram
A post shared by Greenpeace International (@greenpeace)
Greenpeace Africa’s report, Understanding the Climate Debt of Extreme Wealth , finds that climate responsibility is far more concentrated when emissions associated with ownership and investment are considered.
In 2022 alone, the investments of the world’s richest 0.01% were associated with an estimated US$992 billion in climate debt , compared with US$405 billion in consumption-based climate debt.
This finding challenges traditional approaches to climate policy. Climate accountability cannot be understood only through what people consume. It must also account for what they own, where they invest and which economic activities their wealth enables and profits from.
Addressing this reality requires placing the taxation of high-net-worth individuals (HNWIs) and major corporate polluters at the center of the agenda. It means dutiful implementation of the polluter pays principle in our tax systems. It means looking at wealth and capital ownership alongside income, and ensuring that those who profit the most contribute more towards addressing the climate damage their investments caused.
A bold “Make Polluters Pay” projection lit up Houston during CERAWeek—the fossil fuel industry’s so-called “Super Bowl”—calling out Big Oil for its central role in driving the climate crisis. © Greenpeace
How do fair global tax rules protect people and the planet?
We need fairer tax systems that shift the burden to those who cause harm and profit from it, rather than relying on regressive consumption taxes. We need public investments that strengthens climate resilience and helps impacted communities rebuild, instead of being undermined by debt and austerity. Crucially we need international tax rules that address harmful tax practices strapping countries of billions of earned public revenues, and those that empower countries to hold multinational corporations accountable and raise the revenues they need.
This is why the negotiations for a strong and ambitious Global Tax Treaty at the United Nations (also known as United Nations Framework Convention on International Tax Cooperation) matter.
The UN process is working towards a global framework that can shape how taxing rights are allocated, how countries address cross border tax issues and how international tax cooperation works. It offers a historic opportunity to fix global tax rules so that they serve all nations equitably, enabling them to tax the wealthiest polluters and mobilize public resources.
Filipino communities such as those from the Bohol islands continue to carry the scars of Super Typhoon Odette (International name: Rai). The storm not only destroyed homes and livelihoods but also left lasting impacts on vital aspects of their lives such as job and food security, education, and health. © Ivan Joeseff Guiwanon / Greenpeace
Ultimately, this framework can give governments the authority to make the wealthiest polluters pay for the harm they have caused, unlocking trillions of dollars to fund just transition, renewable energy deployment, resilient infrastructure for impacted and vulnerable communities, and essential public services we all need.
These discussions can not happen in vacuum or isolation, they must be brought directly into the IMF and World Bank meetings in Bangkok. These two institutions are currently perpetuating false solutions. In order to fund our future for generations to come, governments must be allowed to redesign their tax policies so that it benefits the majority and not just the wealthiest minority of people. Only by doing that will we stand a chance to achieve climate justice and a safe future for the people and the planet.
Ucizi Ngulube is a socio-environmental and tax justice campaigner with Greenpeace Africa.
Tax the super-rich
Together, let’s urge governments to tax the super-rich and fund a green and fair future.
Add your name