omnist.world

Deutsch

Orthodox · Compare this tradition with another

“Everyone heard them speaking in their own language” (Acts 2:6). The Divine Liturgy in Transliteration

no name given · Analogion – orthodoxes Lesepult · 2025-07-16 · Source

Knowledge · main message Community · carrying

By combining the original text, a practical transliteration, and an official translation in a single booklet, the language barrier in Orthodox worship can be overcome and a deeper understanding of the liturgy made possible.

It is not only Orthodox Christians who ask themselves: What would it be like to be able to understand and simultaneously pray along with the Divine Liturgy in a foreign liturgical language such as Church Slavonic, (Ancient) Greek, Georgian, or Arabic without any difficulty?

The text presents a new three-column booklet that combines the Divine Liturgy in Greek, Arabic, Church Slavonic, or Georgian with transliteration and a German translation. The aim is to enable believers to hear the liturgy in the original language and understand it at the same time, without technical aids. The author refers to the Pentecost event in Acts 2 as a spiritual model for this understanding. He compares the new booklet with an older two-column booklet from 1979, which contained a scholarly transliteration and a translation by Greek-Catholic Uniates. The new edition uses a practical transcription and the official translation of the Orthodox Bishops' Conference in Germany (OBKD) from 2013. The text emphasizes that following along with the liturgical order using this aid should be straightforward. It is a factual announcement of a liturgical aid intended to overcome the language barrier in worship.

Worldview

what this means
What, according to this text, is the root of the evil?
Ignorance, illusion, a false view of reality (inferred)
What helps against it?
insight, learning, enlightenment, right understanding; prayer, worship, meditation, repeated practice
What does the text base its claim on?
on a present head, teacher, or office; on tradition, the fathers, an established practice
To whom does the text's call for devotion apply?
to one's own fellow believers
Where is the text's criticism directed?
the text does not criticise

Related texts from other traditions

by similarity of the analysis, one text per tradition

What the text calls for

Passages cited

Apg 2,1-13

Measured

Basic stance
1 from -2 to 2
Insistence
1 of 3
Reach
3 of 5
Concreteness
3 of 3
Boundary
1 of 3
Time
past 1, present 3, future 0

Analysed with qwen/qwen3.8-27b, version v3. The same standards apply to every tradition, see Values.

Full text in English
Skip to content Not only Orthodox Christians ask themselves: What if one could effortlessly understand and simultaneously pray along with the Divine Liturgy in a foreign liturgical language such as Church Slavonic, (Ancient) Greek, Georgian, or Arabic? What gives hope for a small Pentecostal miracle of tongues (cf. Acts 2:1-13) is indeed possible even without special audio devices that instantly convert the audible into the comprehensible. For this purpose, the book remains the medium of choice. Admittedly, the heard text must be read in parallel in a translation. However, following the liturgical flow using the booklet should be effortless. New: three-column booklets Such an aid in the form of a three-column booklet is now available. The first column initially presents the original text of the Divine Liturgy in Greek, Arabic, Church Slavonic, or Georgian; the middle column contains the respective transcription of the original; and the right column offers—except for the Arabic booklet, which contains the translation blessed by Metropolitan Isaac—the German translation by the Translation Commission of the Orthodox Bishops’ Conference in Germany (OBKD) from 2013. In this form, this is something entirely new. Although a two-column booklet with the Divine Liturgy was already published in 1979, which contained a translation into German in the right column and a transliteration on the left¹. However, on the one hand, a scientific transliteration raises questions regarding practical usability (see below: Transliteration versus Transcription); on the other hand, the translation apparently originates from Greek-Catholic Uniates, which is occasionally noticeable in its terminology (e.g., “Mass offering,” 5; “Preface and Sanctus,” 45). Nevertheless, the booklet represented a first and important step in the right direction at that time.
Full text in the original
Zum Inhalt springen Nicht nur orthodoxe Christen fragen sich: Wie wäre es, die Göttliche Liturgie in einer fremden Liturgiesprache wie dem Kirchenslawischen, (Alt-)Griechischen, Georgischen oder Arabischen problemlos verstehen und zugleich mitbeten zu können? Was auf ein kleines pfingstliches Sprachenwunder hoffen lässt (vgl. Apg 2,1-13 ), ist tatsächlich auch ohne spezielle Audiogeräte, die das Hörbare sofort ins Verstehbare umwandeln, möglich. Hierzu ist das Buch weiterhin das Mittel der Wahl. Zugegebenermaßen muss das Erhörte parallel in einer Übersetzung erlesen werden. Doch sollte das Mitverfolgen des Liturgieablaufs anhand des Büchleins problemlos gelingen. Neu: dreispaltige Hefte Ein solches Hilfsmittel in Form eines dreispaltigen Heftes liegt nun vor. Die erste Spalte gibt zunächst den Originaltext der Göttlichen Liturgie auf Griechisch, Arabisch, Kirchenslawisch oder Georgisch wieder; in der mittleren Spalte steht die jeweilige Umschrift ( Transkription ) des Originals; und die rechten Spalte bietet ― bis auf das arabische Heft, das die von Metropolit Isaak gesegnete Übersetzung enthält ― die deutsche Übersetzung der Übersetzungskommission der Orthodoxen Bischofskonferenz in Deutschland (OBKD) von 2013. In dieser Form ist dies etwas gänzlich Neues. Zwar erschien bereits 1979 ein zweispaltiges Büchlein mit der Göttlichen Liturgie , das in der rechten Spalte eine Übersetzung ins Deutsche und links eine Transliteration beinhaltete 1 . Doch wirft einerseits eine wissenschaftliche Transliteration hinsichtlich der praktischen Verwendbarkeit Fragen auf (s. u. Transliteration versus Transkription ); andererseits stammt die Übersetzung offenbar von griechisch-katholischen Unierten, was ihrer Begrifflichkeit gelegentlich anzumerken ist (z. B.: „Meßopfer“, 5; „Präfation und Sanctus“, 45). Dennoch stellte das Büchlein seinerzeit einen ersten und wichtigen Schritt in die richtige Richtung dar.